Side-by-Side Comparison
Nu Skin Enterprises vs Arbonne International
An honest comparison to help you choose the right opportunity
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1 / 5
VS
Arbonne International
2.4 / 5
Feature Comparison
| Nu Skin Enterprises | Arbonne International | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 2.1/5 | 2.4/5✓ |
| Startup Cost | N/A | N/A |
| Residual Income | 2.1 | 2.4✓ |
| Simplicity | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Transparency | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Community & Support | 2.5 | 3.0✓ |
| Value for Money | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Overall: Arbonne International
Based on our analysis, Arbonne International edges out with an overall rating of 2.4 compared to Nu Skin Enterprises's 2.1. Both options have their merits, but Arbonne International offers a stronger overall opportunity based on our evaluation criteria including compensation structure, product quality, and long-term viability.
Detailed Breakdown
Nu Skin Enterprises
Pros
- 40 years in business — public company (NYSE: NUS)
- Innovative ageLOC skincare technology
- Global presence in 50+ markets
- $122M paid to US Brand Affiliates in 2024
Cons
- Low per-customer residual (~$7/mo)
- Monthly volume requirements for rank maintenance
- New Sales Performance Plan (Nov 2024) adds complexity
- Products priced at significant premium vs retail
Arbonne International
Pros
- 44 years in business — now owned by Groupe Rocher
- Vegan, cruelty-free positioning appeals to clean beauty market
- Per-customer residual ~$12/mo on subscriptions
- Genuine product fans in the wellness space
Cons
- Low per-customer residual (~$12/mo)
- $100 PRV monthly required for commissions
- Filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2020 (restructured)
- Complex multi-level structure
📖
Before you read this — grab the free guide that shows you the fastest path to residual income.
The Residual Income Shortcut: How a 600-person MLM team got replaced by 24 customers.